Journal Opinion Dec.
20, 2018
“There were plenty of good things left….such as tend to make
up a good Christmas dinner, which goes far to show that the barren hills of
Vermont will produce food, with a little fixing, to be agreeable to the eye and
pleasant to the taste.” Vermont Farmer, Jan. 23, 1874
By the time you read this column, your Christmas dinner may already
be prepared or perhaps it is over with even the leftovers finished. But with
some of the holiday season still before us, this column offers you an
opportunity to compare your festive experience with those of others who
experienced Christmas dinners from colonial days to the 1950s.
Each family, past or present, creates Christmas experiences
for itself. Factors such as age, economic status, ethnic heritage and family
traditions and even national and world events have an impact on those
experiences.
No column limited by the space available here can hope to
capture all of the variations found in the assortments that are our nation’s
people. Please be tolerant if it does not speak to your family’s traditions. At
the same time, celebrate and cherish those traditions and pass them on to
younger members of your family and community.
The Puritans and many of their descendants who settled in
our area were opposed to Christmas celebrations. Their objection was based on
its connection with paganism and the Roman Catholic Church as well as the
unruly manner in which the season was celebrated in Europe. No mince pies,
Christmas puddings, holiday ales or goose for them. For settlers, such as those
in Ryegate and Corinth, Thanksgiving and New Year’s Day were more festive.
The Pilgrim Church and Church of England descendants were
more likely to observe Christmas, holding services and encouraging seasonal
charity. Many religious leaders, however, continued to object to the excesses
of the carnival-like celebrations that were often typical of the season in many
communities around the nation.
Until the 1820’s, Christmas celebrations were largely public
rather than family-oriented. As this began to change, festive foods unique to
the season and served within the home became more important. Local markets
catered to the holiday demand with traditional foods that helped to make the
season special. By the 1850s Vermont
newspapers were carrying references to sweetmeats, eggnog, plum pudding, turkey,
and oysters for the family holiday menu.
Christmas in wartime
is especially difficult. For those in the armed services, Christmas meant being
away from home. For the bedraggled troops at Valley Forge in 1777, Christmas
dinner was cooked over a campfire and was likely a gruel made from whatever the
men could scavenge from the nearby farms and forests.
By the Civil War, the foods of Christmas were well-established
in the minds of New Hampshire and Vermont soldiers. Writing from their winter
encampments, soldiers celebrated as they could while lamenting their distance
from the family holiday table.
Local newspapers reported that for Christmas in 1862,
President Lincoln ordered “a great quantity of poultry” for the soldiers in
Washington D. C. hospitals. The following year, the Ladies Relief Society of
Bradford raised funds for a similar Christmas dinner. The U. S. Sanitary
Commission provided Christmas dinner for wounded soldiers from both states.
Also in 1862, it was reported that some members of the 12th
Vermont Regiment, stationed in Fairfax, VA, escaped hardtack and salt pork and
enjoyed a rich meal of oyster soup, potatoes, good Vermont butter and boiled
pork. The meal was topped off with nuts and raisins and “a cocoa-nut cake from
home.”
It was a rare respite from grueling conditions. One soldier wrote “Now that is not such bad
living for poor soldiers, is it? Sitting down to a table and eating like
civilized men.”
One Union veteran recalled that, during the war, he and two
of his fellow soldiers were held prisoner in a Confederate prison. For a time,
prior to Christmas, the three managed to save a small portion of their daily
rations of three tablespoons of cow peas and a pint of corn meal, so that on
Christmas day their meager meal “took on the appearance of a feast.”
In the years following the end of the war, Christmas became even
more important commercially. Vermont
newspapers such as the Vermont Watchman
and the Bradford Opinion published
lists of holiday goods offered by local merchants. Foods offered included Christmas goose and
turkey, canned and fresh fruits. Since
merchants were more specialized in those days, a shopper had to visit several
to get the items needed.
In 1876, the Bradford newspaper featured a front-page
article entitled “The Christmas Dinner.”
In addition to the items listed above, the menu included oyster soup as
well as mince and pumpkin pies and Christmas tarts.
Published at that time, Jennie
June’s American Cookery Book offered an elaborate Christmas dinner menu
including mock turtle soup, turkey with necklace of sausage, cranberry sauce,
oyster fritters and desserts of plum pudding and tipsy cake followed by fruit
and nuts.
Vermont newspaper menus of the 1880’s added other dishes
with the note: “Christmas dinner is hardly complete and satisfying unless a
roast turkey, in its mammoth properties occupies a conspicuous position on the
table.” It also mentioned the folly in “a gorging of dyspeptic sweets and
unwholesome food.”
Many of the period cook books and newspaper articles on
Christmas food reflect the good fortune of those in the middle and upper
classes. The wealthier the family, the more likely the quality and quantity of
the foods would be more substantial.
Christmas was always less festive for the poor and
homeless. Newspapers carried stories of
the plight of the less fortunate.
In 1871, the Bradford
newspaper included the story of one family whose festive meal consisted of a 5-cent loaf of bread. Another story
described a family meal of corn beef, a little box of figs, boiled cabbage and
coffee.
During the period after the Civil War, church and civic
groups as well as some businesses provided dinner for the indigent. Baskets of
food were also distributed by religious groups such as the Methodist churches
and Salvation Army. Veteran groups provided meals for the neediest from their
ranks.
The demand for charity was especially great during periods
of economic depression. During the panics of 1873, 1893 and 1907, Christmas
was, for many people, “just one more day on which to struggle to put food on
the table.”
In 1877, the Vermont Board of Agriculture was promoting the
raising of geese for the Christmas trade. Still, by the end of the century,
Vermont turkeys were becoming nationally known and, according to the Vermont
Board, were “prolific.”
Christmas cookies, candies and cakes were made for home or as
gifts. As in the past, some Christmas foods had to be planned or even made days
or months in advance. Christmas fruit cakes and plum puddings were best when
aged. Rural cooks might make fruit pies in the late fall and store them to
freeze in cold attics until the holidays arrived.
The first decade of the following century experienced
periods of inflated food prices. In 1908, it was reported that the price of
Christmas foods had doubled over the previous five years. Food purchased at
local stores and eateries reflected the increases. At the St. Johnsbury House,
Christmas dinner was advertised at 50 cents per person in 1908 and 75 cents two
years later.
During World War I, the members of the American
Expeditionary Force stationed in France
were promised a traditional Christmas meal. In 1917, the ships carrying
cranberries and turkey were delayed by threats of German submarines causing the
Paris turkey market to be completely depleted. Many of the soldiers stationed
in England were treated to a traditional English dinner of beef and plum
pudding.
On the home front, the grim realities of war scarcity affected
Christmas meals. Cooks were asked to conserve red meat and other foods fueling
the war effort. Christmas fell on a Tuesday that year. It was a day designated
as meatless and so chicken or turkey were acceptable foods.
The Great Depression brought hardships for many families. A
lima-bean casserole at home or soup from a charity kitchen constituted
Christmas dinner for many. For others, Christmas was celebrated in a thrifty
manner, with dinner being described as “enough is better than a feast.” Aunt Sammy’s Radio Recipes reprinted in the United Opinion offered holiday recipes
that fit frugal budgets as well as changing tastes.
When interviewed about their experiences during the 1930s,
local elders recalled that money was scarce and Christmas meant homemade gifts
and homegrown food. That might mean sacrificing the largest turkey or rooster
on the farm or making a plump chicken into a delicious pie. For several, the
food was rabbit or venison.
During WW II, the armed services worked hard to provide a
traditional Christmas meal to personnel at home and abroad. Those in battle
zones were less likely to have all the trimmings. Stateside, canteens provided
Christmas meals to soldiers and sailors
At home, rationing meant that Christmas dinners were not as
elaborate as normal. O, loved ones were
absent. Christmas staples such as chocolate, sugar and butter were rationed
and, although turkeys were not, they were in short supply. The public was
encouraged to stay at home and eat foods
produced locally thereby reducing the impact on the transportation systems.
The prosperity enjoyed by many in the post-war period
resulted in the expansion of the holiday experience. Food was central to that experience and so expanded
waist-lines were not uncommon. Traditional
foods made for decades continued to be part of the holidays that stretched from
Thanksgiving to New Year’s Day.
Traditional foods help to make all those holidays special,
linking the present with the holidays that have gone before. For many families, Christmas day began with a
special breakfast and, depending on the age of the children, was eaten before
or after presents were opened.
At parties and gatherings for employees, club and church
members and neighbors and friends, food was central. Every year, newspapers and
magazines published new recipes that adapted old favorites to new times.
Ethnic groups have always added their own dishes to their
family’s holiday table. Those who fasted before Christmas Midnight Mass, might
follow the service with festive goodies.
For others, Christmas dishes included sweet stollen breads,
holiday tamales, panettone or meat pies. A family with an Italian heritage
might be as likely to serve lasagna and pork loin as turkey. Traditions made
the answer to the question of “What shall we have for Christmas dinner?” pretty
cut and dried.
For a small minority of local residents, the holiday being
celebrated was Hanukkah, an eight-day festival of lights. Special foods might
include brisket and short ribs as well as oil-rich potato latkes and donuts.
For many this Christmas, the local food shelf, community
dinner or donated basket will be the source of their Christmas dinner. It is
estimated that up to 13% of New Hampshire and Vermont families are “food
insecure.” That insecurity is made even more difficult in the face of the
bounty of others.
One Vermont newspaper observed in 1888: “Heaven has not
granted us stomachs according to our wealth and the rich man cannot eat more
than the poor man.” But we know that since finances control the food selection,
the needy have always had less to eat.
In 1891, a
Londonderry, VT newspaper printed the following: “No conscientious person can
enjoy his Christmas dinner if he knows anybody else within reach to be hungry.
The consciousness that we have giving food to the needy provides us with the
finest appetite.”
Whether this holiday for you is sacred or secular or both,
assisting those who face food shortage in your community can add to the
blessings of the season. Even if you are too late to help with someone else’s
Christmas dinner this year, remember there is a new year coming. That donation
to your local food shelf will provide you and yours with finer and more
satisfying appetites.
Union troops open Christmas boxes from home to reveal treats as well as welcome gifts of socks and other article of clothes. |
No comments:
Post a Comment